It fits when
- You suspect "we should be doing something with AI" but can't name the what.
- Your team is carrying operational drag that hasn't been explicitly measured.
- You want an independent read before committing to a platform decision.
Most clients don't arrive with a clear problem statement; they arrive with a feeling. A one-week sprint names it, maps the top three friction points, and recommends a fix (AI, automation, neither, or both) with rough economics attached.
Day 1 · Kickoff + stakeholder interviews
Meet the operational owners, the budget holder, and anyone who has to live with the outcome.
Days 2–3 · Walkthroughs + desk research
Observe the workflows that hurt. Read what you already have. Compare against what peers publish.
Day 4 · Synthesis
Pull the friction points into a map. Score them by impact and effort. Draft the recommendation.
Day 5 · Readout + written report
Joint session with the people who were interviewed. The report lands the same day.
1 week
Fixed fee
Fixed upfront, invoiced at kickoff. No scope creep, no day-rate surprises.
An anonymised sample of a past deliverable for this engagement is being prepared. Until it's published here, the clearest picture comes from the methodology page. This service is one productised slice of the same method.
Most AI programmes fail because nobody stopped to ask what problem they were actually solving. This is the cheapest work we can do for you, and almost always the most valuable.
Once the problem is named, prove the fix.
See the Rapid Secure AI POCNumbers before the build.
See the Cost & ROI ModelWhen AI isn't the answer.
See the Automation-First Pilot